Here is a write-up analyzing the phrase and its context within the LSM lore.
Under FRE 804(b)(6), a statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused—or acquiesced in wrongfully causing—the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result, is admissible. A party cannot benefit from silencing a witness. lsm pbirds casey whipped if nippy had a li
Why does a phrase like "lsm pbirds casey whipped if nippy had a li" gain traction? Here is a write-up analyzing the phrase and
One crisp autumn morning, LSM decided to visit the Pbirds' sanctuary. Upon arrival, they met Casey, a volunteer with a passion for ornithology and a warm smile. As LSM and Casey walked through the sanctuary, they stumbled upon Whipped, an innovative food truck famous for its delicious pastries and coffee. The aroma wafting from Whipped was irresistible, and they decided to take a short break. Why does a phrase like "lsm pbirds casey
Here is a write-up analyzing the phrase and its context within the LSM lore.
Under FRE 804(b)(6), a statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused—or acquiesced in wrongfully causing—the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result, is admissible. A party cannot benefit from silencing a witness.
Why does a phrase like "lsm pbirds casey whipped if nippy had a li" gain traction?
One crisp autumn morning, LSM decided to visit the Pbirds' sanctuary. Upon arrival, they met Casey, a volunteer with a passion for ornithology and a warm smile. As LSM and Casey walked through the sanctuary, they stumbled upon Whipped, an innovative food truck famous for its delicious pastries and coffee. The aroma wafting from Whipped was irresistible, and they decided to take a short break.
